$3 camera challenge

I hate to say it. Our cameras don’t mean a damn thing. Its about what we see, and what we shoot. Here are a roll of photos from a $3 camera I got at good will. It’s a Canon point and shoot with a zoom.  Some (most?) suck. Some are not bad. The camera was $3 at goodwill. The film was $5. Developing was $10. If you can’t do remarkably better with whatver Canikon you’re shooting now, maybe you need to rethink what your’re doing and, why?70250001 70250002 70250003 70250004 70250005 70250008 70250009 70250010 70250011 70250012 70250013 70250014 70250015 70250016 70250017 70250018 70250019 70250020 70250021 70250022 70250023 70250024 70250025 70250026 70250027 70250028 70250029 70250030 70250031 70250032 70250033 70250034 70250035

 

 

3 thoughts on “$3 camera challenge”

  1. Yes, you are absolutely correct David. Unless you are professional photographer who has to ‘deliver the goods’ there is no reason why a camera should even cost $3.00. An Oatmeal box pinhole camera is perfectly capable of delivering stunning work, provided one has the vision! 🙂

Comments are closed.